Journal article
Jane Gingrich, Anja Giudici
Social Policy and Administration, vol. 57(1), 2023, pp. 172-188
Social Policy and Administration, vol. 57(1), 2023, pp. 172-188
DOI:
10.1111/spol.12878
Article
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Gingrich, J., & Giudici, A. (2023). Education as a Tool of Social Equality? Social Policy and Administration, 57(1), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12878
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Gingrich, Jane, and Anja Giudici. “Education as a Tool of Social Equality?” Social Policy and Administration 57, no. 1 (2023): 172–188.
MLA
Click to copy
Gingrich, Jane, and Anja Giudici. “Education as a Tool of Social Equality?” Social Policy and Administration, vol. 57, no. 1, 2023, pp. 172–88, doi:10.1111/spol.12878.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{gingrich2023a,
title = {Education as a Tool of Social Equality?},
year = {2023},
issue = {1},
journal = {Social Policy and Administration},
pages = {172-188},
volume = {57},
doi = {10.1111/spol.12878},
author = {Gingrich, Jane and Giudici, Anja}
}
Summary
Do political parties approach education with different social policy aims? We argue that while parties have adopted a common language of equality as an aim of education, they draw on different conceptions of it linked to diverging social projects. To make this argument, we first normatively distinguish education as a tool for creating equal opportunity, equal outcomes, and representational diversity. We then draw on an original dataset coding the educational content in the political manifestos of the largest center‐left and center‐right party across 19 Western democracies from 1950 to present. The analysis shows that left parties emphasise more equality of outcome than rightwing parties and pay less attention to equality of opportunity, and that they associate equality‐related aims more extensively with promises of resources. These findings suggest that there remain critical differences in parties' understanding of education as a tool of social policy.
Do political parties approach education with different social policy aims? We argue that while parties have adopted a common language of equality as an aim of education, they draw on different conceptions of it linked to diverging social projects. To make this argument, we first normatively distinguish education as a tool for creating equal opportunity, equal outcomes, and representational diversity. We then draw on an original dataset coding the educational content in the political manifestos of the largest center‐left and center‐right party across 19 Western democracies from 1950 to present. The analysis shows that left parties emphasise more equality of outcome than rightwing parties and pay less attention to equality of opportunity, and that they associate equality‐related aims more extensively with promises of resources. These findings suggest that there remain critical differences in parties' understanding of education as a tool of social policy.